SMRTR AIMay 24, 2026Scientific American

Why lawyers keep citing fake cases invented by AI

SMRTR summary

Lawyers keep citing fake court cases generated by AI, and courts have now documented over 1,400 such errors in three years. The problem goes beyond law — journalists, researchers, and government workers have also been burned by AI "hallucinations." Studies show people trust AI even knowing it makes mistakes, partly because its confident-sounding wrong answers feel believable. Warnings help somewhat, but workplace pressure and improving AI performance make people less likely to verify outputs.

SMRTR provides this summary for quick context. The original article belongs to Scientific American.

Read the original article
SMRTR AI

Get the next batch of curated stories in your inbox.

This archive is built from SMRTR newsletter stories. Subscribe for hand-picked stories without the extra noise.

Related Stories

Browse AI
AIAug 27, 2026

SpaceKit AI

SpaceKit AI is a public research hub for Growformer, an ML system with a promote-freeze neural substrate, language model experiments, neural cellular automata, and reproducible...

AIAug 27, 2026

Small Models Have Arrived

Small AI models are now 10x cheaper than before, making high-volume consumer and business AI apps financially viable—tasks costing $1 now cost ~$0.10, enabling affordable,...

AIAug 27, 2026

Why I Am Right About AI

The piece satirizes tech-bro certainty about AI replacing writers, using absurd logic and fake statistics to parody real thought leaders—exposing how hollow and self-serving those...