Developers Say GPT-5 Is a Mixed Bag
SMRTR summary
GPT-5 has received mixed reviews from developers since its launch last week. While it excels at technical reasoning and planning, some developers believe Anthropic's models still produce better code, with GPT-5 sometimes generating unnecessary or redundant lines. The model stands out for being significantly more cost-effective than competitors—costing $30 for tests that would cost $400 with Anthropic's Opus 4.1—though Princeton researchers found it scored lower on accuracy (27% versus Claude's 51%).
SMRTR provides this summary for quick context. The original article belongs to Wired.
Read the original article